Chapter 8: Social Impact Assessment Case Study - 3 : Women’s Healthcare and Gender Empowerment (SAS 400)

Social Impact Assessment Case Study: Women’s Healthcare and Gender Empowerment (SAS 400)

This case study evaluates the practical application of Draft Social Impact Assessment Standard (SAS) 400, which focuses on promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women and LGBTQIA+ communities. It explores a healthcare intervention by NGO Sakhi designed to address systemic barriers to maternal and reproductive health in rural India.

8.3.1 Project Context and Social Intent

In rural India, women face significant challenges in accessing quality healthcare due to limited infrastructure and deep-seated cultural barriers. NGO Sakhi launched the Women Healthcare Program to bridge these gaps through a community-centric approach.

Core Mission and Objectives

  • Access: To provide essential healthcare services, including maternal and reproductive health, to underserved populations.
  • Awareness: To educate women on reproductive health, menstrual hygiene, and the necessity of regular medical check-ups.
  • Empowerment: To enable women to make informed decisions about their own well-being and act as health advocates within their communities.
  • Equity: To reduce gender disparities in healthcare access and foster social inclusion.

Strategic Implementation Activities

The program utilised a multi-pronged strategy to deliver impact:

  • Mobile Health Clinics: Providing on-site prenatal care, vaccinations, and family planning counselling in remote villages.
  • Awareness Workshops: Conducting sessions on hygiene and reproductive health attended by over 15,000 women.
  • Capacity Building: Training local healthcare workers in maternal care best practices to ensure high-quality service delivery.
  • Menstrual Hygiene Management: Distributing sanitary pads to reduce health complications and improve school attendance for girls.
  • Institutional Partnerships: Collaborating with local hospitals to facilitate safe deliveries and post-natal care at reduced costs.
  • Mental Health Integration: Providing counselling and support groups specifically for new mothers experiencing stress or anxiety.

8.3.2 SIA Methodology and Data Collection

The Social Impact Assessor employed a comprehensive methodology to measure the "delta change" across 20 villages.

Stakeholder Mapping

Data was triangulated from the following groups to ensure a holistic assessment:

  • Direct Beneficiaries: Women receiving medical services, hygiene products, and mental health support.
  • Implementing Team: NGO field staff and healthcare providers responsible for program execution.
  • Local Government: Panchayat members and health officials who supported resource allocation.
  • Partner Organisations: External NGOs and medical entities collaborating on delivery.

Collection Tools and Sampling

  • Sampling Strategy: A 15% sample of beneficiaries was selected from the targeted villages.
  • Quantitative Tools: 750 surveys were conducted to measure reach and service effectiveness.
  • Qualitative Tools: 20 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and 8 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were used to gather in-depth insights from beneficiaries and experts.
  • Desk Review: Analysis of annual program reports, health outcome data, and beneficiary feedback logs.
  • Field Inspection: Direct observation of mobile clinic operations and community outreach activities.

8.3.3 Assessment of Evaluation Criteria (Key Impact Indicators)

The assessment focused on quantifying health improvements and qualifying the social shift in gender dynamics.

Quantitative Impact Metrics

Indicator Outcome Achieved
Direct Beneficiaries Over 20,000 women received medical and hygiene support.
Indirect Reach 50,000+ people, including family and community members.
Healthcare Access 75% increase in access for women in remote areas.
Knowledge Improvement 80% rise in maternal health awareness among participants.
Maternal Health 60% reduction in maternal mortality in high-risk zones.
Prenatal Care 65% of participants accessed prenatal services.
Community Engagement 90% attendance at health workshops and mobile clinics.
Child Marriage 40% decrease in child marriage rates in participating communities.

Qualitative Impact Metrics

  • Behavioural Change: Significant shift in hygiene practices and nutritional habits within households.
  • Economic Empowerment: Improved health allowed women to participate more actively in the workforce, enhancing household stability.
  • Reduced Stigma: Distribution of sanitary pads and awareness drives helped break traditional taboos surrounding menstruation.
  • Mental Well-being: Enhanced coping mechanisms and support systems for new mothers through integrated counselling.
  • Community Ownership: Strengthened pride and local involvement in sustaining health initiatives.

8.3.4 Challenges and Assessment Limitations

Implementation Challenges

  • Infrastructure Gaps: A lack of basic amenities and health facilities in remote regions hindered consistent care delivery.
  • Resource Constraints: Insufficient funding for continuous training and the procurement of medical supplies.
  • Cultural Resistance: Traditional beliefs occasionally obstructed the adoption of modern medical practices.
  • Workforce Retention: Difficulty in keeping trained healthcare workers in remote areas due to challenging conditions.

Assessment Limitations

  • Baseline Gaps: Inconsistent initial data made it difficult to measure long-term trends for certain indicators.
  • Stakeholder Overlap: Roles of community leaders and beneficiaries often overlapped, complicating data isolation.
  • Quantifying "Soft" Data: Challenges in assigning numerical values to changes in self-awareness and confidence.
  • Regional Variation: Differences in existing support systems across villages led to inconsistent program outcomes.

8.3.5 Key Takeaways for Assessors

  • Thematic Alignment: Projects under SAS 400 must demonstrate a clear link to SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being).
  • Holistic Health: Success is not just measured by surgeries or treatments, but by improvements in economic participation and educational attendance.
  • Sustainability: Long-term impact relies on shifting community attitudes and establishing digital platforms for ongoing health education.

Important Terms

  • Maternal Mortality Rate: The number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, used as a primary indicator of healthcare efficacy.
  • Reproductive Health Awareness: The level of knowledge regarding family planning, hygiene, and prenatal care.
  • Social Inclusion: The process of improving the terms on which individuals take part in society, specifically targeting marginalised women.
  • Beneficiary Validation: The process of using surveys and feedback to confirm that the reported social impact is accurate and valued by the community.

Practice with a Free Mock Test

Ready to test your NISM-Series-23: Social Impact Assessors Mock Tests preparation? Start with Test 1 — no payment required.

Notify me when you update the Notes

Free account · No payment needed for Test 1

Create a free PassNISM account

Continue with Google to start a free NISM mock test (Test 1) for this subject, save scores, and compare attempts.

Continue with Google